Inspect before signup
Inspect the quote-to-signed-job system before you buy into it.
See what the product generates, what the client handoff looks like, what happens after signup, and who each plan is actually for.
This is built around a real American home-service sales moment: driveway walkthrough, same-day send, homeowner review, then a cleaner signed next step.
Built around the jobsite moment
The product should feel like it belongs in a driveway, on a tablet, before the contractor heads to the next estimate.
Proof layer
Inspect the workflow in one place
See the sample, screenshots, case study, and signup flow before you decide whether to test it on a real quote.
Inspect the sample proposal
See the exact format clients review, including scope, pricing, terms, warranty, branding, and signature flow.
Open sample proposal →Read the Cody workflow case study
See what we can directly show from one real contractor workflow, plus what is clearly labeled as user-reported.
Read case study →Review real screenshot proof
See the real contractor screenshots already used on the site instead of anonymous testimonial boxes with no context.
See screenshots on homepage →What is directly verifiable today
- ✓5 featured contractor accounts currently used as public proof references
- ✓Real screenshot testimonials already visible on-site
- ✓A live sample proposal you can inspect before signup
- ✓A public case study based on a real contractor workflow
- ✓30-day Pro guarantee with a plain-English refund path
- ✓A free plan that lets you test one real proposal before paying
Important honesty rule
Where outcomes are mentioned, user-reported results are labeled that way. Workflow proof and output proof are shown separately from broader business-result claims.
Who this is for, and who it is not for
Best fit
- ✓Home service contractors who quote real jobs every week
- ✓Owner-operators who want faster, cleaner proposals without rebuilding the document every time
- ✓Contractors who want scope, line items, terms, signing, and follow-up in one workflow
Not the right fit
- •Contractors looking for a full CRM or field-service dispatch platform
- •Teams that do not send proposals and only quote verbally or on paper
- •Buyers expecting done-for-you sales or traffic acquisition inside the core app
Decision-point trust checks
Check 1
Inspect the exact sample proposal before you sign up.
Check 2
Use Free on one real job before deciding whether Pro belongs in your weekly workflow.
Check 3
If you upgrade, the risk is bounded by the 30-day Pro guarantee.
Quantified proof
Conservative numbers, kept in one place
These are the current product-level numbers we can defend publicly today, without inflating the story.
847+
proposals generated by real contractors
5
featured contractor proof references
7
home service trades currently served
3
inspectable public proof assets
Inspectable proof assets currently count the sample proposal, the public Cody case study, and real testimonial screenshots already visible on the site.
Proof before payment
You can inspect the output before you create an account.
Test before upgrade
Free exists so the workflow can prove itself on one real job first.
Risk stays bounded
Pro still carries the plain-English 30-day guarantee.
Need the full trust path first? See the proof page.
What happens after signup
Step 1
Start with one real proposal
You enter the client, job, and price details. The product drafts the proposal before you send anything.
Step 2
Review before you send
You can edit the scope, line items, and language before it ever reaches a client.
Step 3
Send one link and track what happens
The client gets a cleaner proposal, and you can track opens, signing, and the next follow-up action.
Step 4
Upgrade only when the workflow proves itself
Free is for testing one real proposal. Pro is the normal paid plan once this becomes part of your weekly quoting system.
Which plan is for who
Free
Best if you want to test one real proposal first without committing.
Pro
Best if you quote every week and want one system to create, send, track, and sign proposals without limits.
Premium
Best if you already want Pro, but also want a bounded setup sprint to clean up branding, defaults, structure, and one real proposal faster.
What Premium help means right now
Premium is not a vague upgrade. It means Pro plus a bounded Proposal System Setup sprint that cleans up branding, defaults, structure, and one real proposal so the quoting workflow is actually installed.
Who this is for
- • Owner-operators and small crews sending weekly residential proposals
- • Contractors who want the homeowner to trust the scope, price, warranty, and next step faster
- • Businesses that need same-day send, cleaner follow-up, and a real signature path
Who this is not for
- • Teams shopping for dispatch, production-management, or full CRM software first
- • Contractors who rarely send formal proposals and mostly quote verbally
- • Buyers expecting generic AI writing or done-for-you lead generation instead of a proposal-first workflow
Decision path
The trust path should be short.
By this point, a contractor should know what the proposal looks like, how the client sees it, and how to test the workflow without pretending this is something else.
Do this in order
Step 1
Inspect the output first
Open the sample proposal and judge the homeowner-facing format before you even create an account.
Inspect sample proposal →Step 2
Read one real workflow story
Use the Cody case study to see the difference between direct workflow proof and user-reported outcome language.
Read Cody case study →Step 3
Test it on one live quote
Use Free on one real job. That is the only test that matters before Pro becomes part of your weekly quoting stack.
Start free on one real proposal →Why contractors actually move forward
- •The quote can leave while the job is still warm instead of showing up later that night.
- •The homeowner sees a cleaner scope, price, warranty, and approval path instead of a rough estimate.
- •Free exists for the first real test, and Pro only makes sense once quoting becomes a weekly workflow.
The point of this sequence
A colder buyer should never need a sales call just to understand what the product does, what proof exists, and how to test it with low risk.
If the sample, proof, and one live quote test do not create conviction, the right move is not to force the sale.
Workflow preview
What the workflow actually looks like at the points that matter
The point is not abstract features. It is whether the real workflow looks clean where contractors actually win or lose trust: review, send, and sign.
Review screen
The contractor can review the scope, line items, terms, and send-readiness before it goes out.
Send flow
Client handoff
Client email entered
Signing link generated
Follow-up sequence ready
This is the difference between a rough estimate and a cleaner client handoff with an actual next step.
Client signing view
Scope of work
Pricing and totals
Payment terms
Warranty
The buyer should be able to picture what the homeowner sees before trusting the platform.
Plain-English trust summary
You should be able to inspect every step before you buy the workflow.
That is the bar here. Inspect the sample proposal, look at the screenshots, read the case study if you want more context, then test one real proposal for free.
The real test is whether the homeowner would trust the scope, understand what is included, and feel safer saying yes to the cleaner version you send.